At Escentral, we’re often asked about the difference between real, planned, and adjusted class sizes. Understanding these terms, and why each is used, is essential for anyone involved in university timetabling, space planning, or utilisation reporting.
In this article, we break down what each term means, why they matter, and how they fit together.
Real Class Size
Planned Class Size
The planned class size is the estimated number of students for each timetabled activity.
How planned figures are set varies. In some institutions, course or module leads provide them, whilst others use advanced modelling techniques. Many rely on educated estimates, often based on previous years’ numbers adjusted for recruitment targets.
Because planned sizes form the basis of the timetable, accuracy here is critical. If the figures are off, problems arise:
- Rooms may be too large or too small.
- Too many or too few group activities may be created.
- Late changes may be required, disrupting both staff and students.
Ultimately, the teaching estate must accommodate what is timetabled. In practice, this means planned numbers can drive estate requirements more so than real sizes.
Good practice: Once enrolments are complete, compare planned vs. real sizes at module level. Identify where the differences lie, trace back the causes, and adjust processes before the next timetable build. Institutions that continuously refine their process for determining planned data can right-size their estate, reduce inefficiencies, and improve the overall student experience.
Adjusted Class Size
Not every activity will have a real size recorded, for example, ad hoc activities such as meetings or events without direct student allocation. To ensure completeness, we use the adjusted class size.
The adjusted value is derived as follows:
- Use the real size where available.
- If no real size exists, use the planned size.
- If neither is available, use the room capacity, on the assumption that if a specific room has been booked, it is reasonable to assume the full space may be used.
This ensures that every timetabled activity has a class size value.
Why Adjusted Class Size Matters
For timetable utilisation reporting, the adjusted class size is the most practical and reliable measure because it:
Without this adjustment, gaps in the data would undermine reporting and reduce confidence in utilisation metrics.
- Ensures no activities are excluded from occupancy or utilisation calculations.
- Provides a consistent, complete dataset.
- Uses the most accurate available value for each activity.
Without this adjustment, gaps in the data would undermine reporting and reduce confidence in utilisation metrics.
Final Thoughts
In summary:
A high-quality timetable dataset will contain a class size for every activity and only a narrow gap between planned and real values. Any missing or inaccurate figures represent opportunities to refine processes, improve the dataset, and strengthen the university’s ability to deliver both a cost-effective estate and a high-quality timetable.
- Real = the true number of students enrolled.
- Planned = the estimated number used to build the timetable.
- Adjusted = the complete dataset that fills in the gaps for reporting.
A high-quality timetable dataset will contain a class size for every activity and only a narrow gap between planned and real values. Any missing or inaccurate figures represent opportunities to refine processes, improve the dataset, and strengthen the university’s ability to deliver both a cost-effective estate and a high-quality timetable.
